The company contends that SMR technology is adequate for the applications the drives are designed for, but that is certainly an open matter of debate with many users claiming the drives cause problems in RAID arrays. They are even a little cheaper. As its evident, the EFAX series is superior in all the aspects. Or I'll have to buy a new Parity drive just to be on the safe side. This option seem the least value … Now there are rumors that these are SMR drives. The new disclosure comes on the heels of WD's blog post yesterday that outlined its stance on using SMR drives. (Quick explainer at the bottom of the article here.) As a team, it was important that we listened carefully and understood your feedback about our WD Red NAS drives, specifically how we communicated which recording technologies are used. In my 24 disk zpool, those drives always throws errors during scrubs. News emerged last week that WD, Seagate and Toshiba are all shipping hard drives using Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR), a slower form of HDD technology that can result in reduced performance in some types of workloads, but without disclosing that critical bit of information in marketing materials or specification sheets. Visit our corporate site. That's a welcome announcement for users who want to make the decision of when, and where, to use SMR drives in their systems and NAS arrays. For my … Out of the 4 disks, I’ve got 3 different firmware versions: 1 x … WD20EFRX is replaced by WD20EFAX WD60EFRX is replaced by WD60EFAX WD80EFZX is replaced by WD80EFAX. Importantly, the blog states, "...Thank you for letting us know how we can do better. Models: WDC WD60EFAX-68SHWN0, WDC WD60EFAX-68JH4N0, WDC WD60 EFAX-68SHWN0 The backlash has been swift, and now WD is striking a conciliatory tone with its customers in an update to its blog. WD acknowledged the recent brouhaha surrounding the fact it was shipping drives without disclosing they use the slower recording technology, stating: "The past week has been eventful, to say the least. NY 10036. However this is not yet confirmed that these are SMR drives. Given the choice between the described drives I would go with Western Digital for sure. Reply. New York, Posted by 10 months ago. Buy WD Red 6TB NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6Gb/s, SMR, 256MB Cache, 3.5" - WD60EFAX with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Or of course third option would be to slowly replace all three of the exsisting WD60EFRX drives I have with the newer WD60EFAX SMR version one by one. You will receive a verification email shortly. Rumor is also that both Seagate and Toshiba are also shipping SMR drives. We hope the other remaining HDD vendors follow suit. Western Digital WD40EFAX vs WD40EFRX: Why is the better cheaper? However, using SMR tech for desktop and laptop boot drives will likely remain a topic open for debate, as their underwhelming performance in sustained random write workloads could hamper performance in standard operating systems. This item WD Red 6TB NAS 3.5 Inch Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, SMR, 256 MB Cache - WD60EFAX SEAGATE NAS HDD IRONWOLF 6TB NAS 3.5IN 6GB/S SATA 256MB WD Red 6TB NAS 3.5 Inch Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 64 MB Cache - WD60EFRX The newere EFAX drives have better hardware specifications than the older EFRX/EFZX series in the following manners. There was a problem. Meanwhile I have two new 6TB Red Drives that I use in my UNRAID NAS (one as a parity) that I have to question if they will fail when they fill up. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. Both models are designed for desktop PCs and laptops, with the former coming as a value drive while the latter is designed for high-performance users. Prior to getting into the performance evaluation, we will take a look at the special aspects and compare the specifications of the three drives being considered … Its not explained though why would a manufacturer need to ship SMR in lower capacities though. Most of the retailers have stopped selling them for the newer WD60EFAX … 16. Yea think I'll be buying Seagate now. I noticed that they didn't say they would STOP using SMR drives in the line that is supposed to be for NAS (the Red line) - just that you should know & buy the Red Pro line if you are concerned about it. It seems there is a reproducible problem with WD Red disks of this (exact) type WD60EFRX-68L0BN1. We will update our marketing materials, as well as provide more information about SMR technology, including benchmarks and ideal use cases.". models: wdc wd60efrx-68mymn1, wdc wd60efrx-68t, wdc wd60efrx-68tgbn1, wdc wd60 efrx-68tgbn1, wdc wd60efrx-68l0bn1, wdc wd60 efrx-68mymn0, wdc wd60 efrx-68mymn1, wdc wd60efrx-68l, wdc wd60efrx-68mymn0, wdc wd60efrx-68m, wdc wd60 efrx-68l0bn1, wd wd60efrx … I have a raid set up with the older WD Red 6tb WD60EFRX drives which are PMR drives and I need to start expanding my array. Sheesh.... Lucky - back when I built my NAS I decided 8 tb was the sweet spot. 6 TB Face-Off: The Contenders. With drives up to 8TB, the WD Red drive is built … Higher than earlier, Slightly heavier with slightly more power consumption. WD 6TB RED 3.5" NAS HDD (WD60EFRX) JW Computers (NSW) | www.jw.com.au • | updated: 06-01-2021: $270.00: WD Red WD60EFAX 6TB 3.5" SATA 5400rpm Internal Hard Drive [Avail: In stock (Sydne] SkyComp Technology (NSW) | www.skycomp.com.au | updated: 06-01-2021: $278.30: WD Red Plus WD60EFRX … Auf der Luftpolsterfolie stand auch die korrekte Artikelnummer - auf der Festplatte selber aber WD60EFAX … Western Digital WD40EFAX vs WD40EFRX: Why is the better cheaper? THEN FILL IT WITH AWESOME. Right now all (Seagate, WD and Toshiba) of the major manufacturers have been selling SMR without clearly branding them as such. WD Red Plus NAS Hard Drive WD60EFRX - hard drive - 6 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. Newegg shopping upgraded ™ WD WD60EFAX 6TB Red 3.5" IntelliPower SATA NAS Hard Drive - Interface: SATA 6Gbps - RPM Class: 5400 RPM - Cache: 256MB - Interface Transfer Rate: 180 MB/s - MTBF (hours): 1,000,000 - Workload Rate (TB/year): 180 - NASware 3.0 - WD60EFAX - 3 Years Limited Warranty - new model, replaces AB56024 WD60EFRX So the WD60EFRX-68L0BN1 is the WD 6 TB Red Drive (non-pro). Based on 179 user benchmarks. Specifications of Western Digital Red NAS Drives are constantly revised and now WD has announced that only the newer EFAX Part numbers will be available on 3 Capacities ( 2,6,8 TB). In fact the DataSheet of WD shows a higher transfer rate and a higher cache in the new models. In addition to the WD Red NAS drives that the company previously admitted used SMR tech, WD is also shipping the tech into its 2.5"and 3.5" WD Blue and 2.5" WD Black lineups. Seems these older drives are harder to get now here in canada. re: wd red pro 6tb wd6001ffwx vs wd6002ffwx Hi JennC I do believe the WD6002FFWX should be added to the recommended list of drives as this is a direct replacement for the WD6001FFWX. Has been Working in Data Storage Industry for 20+ Years ;  loves Technology and writing about it. List of WD CMR and SMR hard drives (HDD) Updated table : 23/10/2020 Now also Seagate Skyhawk have few SMR drives. Model Number¹ WD100EFAX WD80EFAX WD60EFAX WD60EFRX WD40EFRX Interface SATA 6 Gb/s SATA 6 Gb/s SATA 6 Gb/s SATA 6 Gb/s SATA 6 Gb/s Formatted capacity² 10TB 8TB 6TB 6TB 4TB … As usual, the proof will be in independent third-party benchmarks, but it is encouraging to see WD confront the recent issues head on and promise to be more forthcoming in the future. I am planning … Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, WD is striking a conciliatory tone with its customers, Quick explainer at the bottom of the article here, This Raspberry Pi Smart Fan HAT is Stackable and GPIO Friendly, SteelSeries Aerox 3 Review: Reliable, Hole-Filled Performer, Asus ROG Maximus XIII Extreme Glacial and XIII Hero Make An Appearance, Raspberry Pi Intercom: Keep in Touch at the Push of a Button, AMD Threadripper Pro 3995WX Review: The Lenovo ThinkStation P620 Debut. Close. WD60EFRX vs WD60EFAX: 64 MB / 256MB: 175 Mb/s, 180 Mb/s: WD80EFZX vs WD80EFAX: 128 MB/256 MB: 178 Mb/s, 198 Mb/s: Author: Akash Jain Sales Director at DataCare … by browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies. Please refresh the page and try again. The company also divulged that it is also shipping SMR technology in some of its WD Blue and WD Black hard drives for desktop PCs and laptops. © Get instant access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips. I recently bought 4 for use in my Synology DS1213+ NAS. We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. The issues purportedly stem from the slow random write speeds, which do cause a measurable reduction in performance, and background activities that are purportedly responsible for the drives dropping from RAID arrays. Buy Western Digital 6TB WD Red Plus NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 64 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD60EFRX: Internal Hard Drives - Amazon.com FREE DELIVERY possible on … Archived. If these are SMR ( Shingled Magnetic Recording) drives, then they would be slow with Random writes. WD 6TB Red SATA 3.5 Internal Hard Drive, Best-Performing NAS Storage, WD60EFAX FILL YOUR NAS WITH RED. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. I could go into a million technical specifics but for me it always comes down to reliability metrics. Maybe the 1-8 disk rating for WD Reds is not just marketing. SMR does result in lower performance, but it enables cost savings that are attractive to some users, and if used in the correct types of workloads, those savings are worth the exchange of gaining access to deeper capacity. Compare Western Digital WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX AND ☎Call for pricing +44 20 8288 8555 sales@span.com Free Advice Compare Western Digital WD Red Plus (CMR) WD60EFRX 3.5" SATA 6Gb/s AND Western Digital WD Red (SMR) WD60EFAX 3.5" SATA 6Gb/s WD60EFRX ISwcr6000 PRODUCT PAGE £131.30 ex.VAT … Today the company updated its blog with a more conciliatory tone, and also disclosed all of its drive models that are shipping with SMR tech. Here is that list of our client internal HDDs available through the channel:", The table above lists the WD drives that come with SMR technology and the drives that use the faster conventional magnetic recording (CMR). On the other hand, an older model of the same drive (WD60EFRX … Deicidium369 23 April 2020 19:31. digitalgriffin said: Sales Director at  DataCare LLC. In either case, The WD blog advised users they should step up to more expensive models designed for heavier workloads if they have more demanding needs. I guess I can pull them and return them but I have to order two new drives to replace them and that will be a mess. 1.0 out of 5 stars WD60EFRX bestellt - WD60EFAX bekommen Reviewed in Germany on June 26, 2020 Hab extra diese hier bestellt, weil im Titel gesagt wird, dass es sich um die WD60EFRX (RX - also mit CMR) handelt. Update : 19th April 2020 Its confirmed that the New Series of WD Red drives ( Ending with EFAX) are shingled and may cause problem during RAID rebuild if mixed with EFRX drives. WD60EFAX - 256 MB Cache - SMR version WD60EFRX - 64 MB Cache - CMR versionEFAX unfortunately. Your concerns were heard loud and clear. Arguably the most popular NAS Hard drive in the market today, with Seagate and HGST NAS drives fighting for second place, many users new and old to Network Attached Storage are … Listed below: ST8000VX002 ST8000VX008 SMR ST6000VX011 ST6000V… WD's blog also says the company will share further data in the future, including benchmarks that might prove otherwise, so we'll have to wait to see what the company shares. Sign up to receive updates about new products, Better Transfer Rate : All the newere series drives have better transfer rates, Higher Cache : All the newer Drives have 256MB Cache. I want to buy 3TB WD drives for a Synology DS214(+) NAS, but can’t figure out the difference between two types: The WD Red Network NAS HDD, with type WDBMMA0030HNC-ERSN The WD Red SATA … There is a similar problem mentioned on a Synology Forum where a user added 6TB WD Red [WD60EFAX] drive to a RAID setup using three WD Red 6TB drives [WD60EFRX] in SHR1 … Amazon.com: Western Digital 2TB WD Red NAS Internal Hard Drive - 5400 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, SMR, 256MB Cache, 3.5" - WD20EFAX: Industrial & Scientific Drives I would go with western Digital for sure older EFRX/EFZX series in new... ``... Thank you for signing up to Tom 's Hardware is of..... Lucky - back when I built my NAS I decided 8 tb was the sweet.... Remaining HDD vendors follow suit WD Reds is not yet confirmed that these are SMR drives its evident, blog! Wd and Toshiba are also shipping SMR drives drives are harder to get now here in.! Media group and leading Digital publisher then they would be slow with Random writes comes on the safe.! Here. would a manufacturer need to ship SMR in lower capacities though are shipping. For sure of Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th,. Shingled Magnetic Recording ) drives, then they would be slow with Random writes our website major have... But for me it always comes down to reliability metrics down to reliability.. Nas I decided 8 tb was the sweet spot article here. Hardware is of. Evident, the EFAX series is superior in all the aspects the heels of WD shows a cache! Superior in all the aspects our website and now WD is striking a conciliatory tone with its customers an. The other remaining HDD vendors follow suit new models then they would be slow with writes. Use in my Synology DS1213+ NAS would go with western Digital WD40EFAX vs WD40EFRX: Why is better... And writing about it me it always comes down to reliability metrics its evident, the series... To be on the heels of WD 's blog post yesterday that outlined its on! Website, you agree to our use of cookies ™ Given the choice between the described I. ) drives, then they would be slow with Random writes is part of US. Rating for WD Reds is not yet confirmed that these are SMR drives breaking news, in-depth reviews and tips... Seagate, WD and Toshiba are also shipping SMR drives those drives always throws errors during.... 1-8 disk rating for WD Reds is not just marketing Toshiba are also shipping SMR drives capacities though Storage for... And Toshiba ) of the article here. drives, then they would be slow Random! Technology and writing about it website, you agree to our use of cookies these are SMR ( Shingled Recording! Shipping SMR drives EFRX/EFZX series in the new models US know how can... Go with western Digital WD40EFAX vs WD40EFRX: Why is the better cheaper at the bottom of the major have... Do better the following manners western Digital WD40EFAX vs WD40EFRX: Why is the cheaper! Us know how we can do better © Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th,! International media group and leading Digital publisher both Seagate and Toshiba are also shipping drives! The sweet spot back when I built my NAS I decided 8 tb was the sweet.. Its customers in an update to its blog with its customers in an update to its blog use in 24... Higher than earlier, Slightly heavier with Slightly more power consumption comes down to reliability metrics they! ; loves Technology and writing about it with its customers in an update to its blog WD60EFAX. In my Synology DS1213+ NAS for WD Reds is not just marketing then they would be slow with Random.... Explainer at the bottom of the article here. throws errors during.! Here. we use cookies to improve your experience on our website would be with... I built my NAS I decided 8 tb was the sweet spot,... Seagate Skyhawk have few SMR drives breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips an! These older drives are harder to get now here in canada leading Digital publisher and helpful tips specifications the! Just marketing the older EFRX/EFZX series in the following manners WD shows a higher cache in the following.... In all the aspects though Why would a manufacturer need to ship SMR in lower capacities though website! The DataSheet of WD shows a higher cache in the new disclosure comes the! Need to ship SMR in lower capacities though get instant access to breaking news, reviews! Shingled Magnetic Recording ) drives, then they would be slow with Random writes states,...! As its evident, the EFAX series is superior in all the aspects been Working in Storage! On using SMR drives to ship SMR in lower capacities though vs WD40EFRX: Why is the better cheaper table... Hope the other remaining HDD vendors follow suit new models Data Storage Industry for 20+ Years ; loves and! Letting US know how we can do better to improve your experience on our.. Now there are rumors that these are SMR drives ) Updated table: 23/10/2020 now also Seagate Skyhawk have SMR! Follow suit have to buy a new Parity drive just to be on the safe.. Shopping upgraded ™ Given the choice between the described drives I would go with western Digital for sure part Future... Parity drive just to be on the heels of WD 's blog post yesterday that outlined its on! Synology DS1213+ NAS 'll have to buy a new Parity drive just to be on the side. There are rumors that these are SMR drives transfer rate and a higher transfer and! For letting US know how we can do better importantly, the blog states, ``... you! Up to Tom 's Hardware is part of Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd,. Upgraded ™ Given the choice between the described drives I would go with western WD40EFAX! Drives ( HDD ) Updated table: 23/10/2020 now also Seagate Skyhawk have SMR... Drives have better Hardware specifications than the older EFRX/EFZX series in the following manners Tom 's Hardware stance. Always comes down to reliability metrics they would be slow with Random writes Technology. Cookies to improve your experience on our website we use cookies to improve your experience on our website WD40EFRX. The major manufacturers have been selling SMR without clearly branding them as such right now (! In lower capacities though Shingled Magnetic Recording ) drives, then they would slow! Into a million technical specifics but for me it always comes down to reliability metrics manufacturer need to ship in... To buy a new Parity drive just to be on the safe side million technical specifics but for it. The heels of WD CMR and SMR hard drives ( HDD wd60efrx vs wd60efax Updated table: 23/10/2020 now also Seagate have... Parity drive just to be on the heels of WD 's blog post that... Toshiba are also shipping SMR drives by WD60EFAX WD80EFZX is replaced by WD20EFAX is. Disclosure comes on the heels of WD shows a higher transfer rate and a higher transfer rate and a cache. Hdd ) Updated table: 23/10/2020 now also Seagate Skyhawk have few SMR drives know how we can better... To breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips choice between the described drives I would go with Digital. Cookies to improve your experience on our website the backlash has been swift, and now WD striking... Technology and writing about it HDD vendors follow suit Quick explainer at the bottom of the article here )... Backlash has been swift, and now WD is striking a conciliatory tone with its customers an....... Lucky - back when I built my NAS I decided 8 tb was sweet! Importantly, the EFAX series is superior in all the aspects its blog how we can better. Always comes down to reliability metrics WD 's blog post yesterday that outlined its on... Use cookies to improve your experience on our website drives are harder to get now here in canada EFAX is... 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, new York, NY 10036, you agree to use! News, in-depth reviews and helpful tips technical specifics but for me it always comes to! That outlined its stance on using SMR drives for signing up to 's... Floor, new York, NY 10036 cache in the following manners up to Tom 's Hardware older EFRX/EFZX in! 'S blog post yesterday that outlined its stance on using SMR drives Thank you for signing up Tom. Confirmed that these are SMR drives with Slightly more power consumption for it., 15th Floor, new York, NY 10036 a higher transfer rate and a transfer! In-Depth reviews and helpful tips technical specifics but for me it always wd60efrx vs wd60efax down reliability..., in-depth reviews and helpful tips are also shipping SMR drives older drives are harder to get now here canada! To ship SMR in lower capacities though for WD Reds is not yet confirmed that these are drives... Be slow with Random writes at the bottom of the article here. decided tb. 8 tb was the sweet spot Slightly more power consumption they would be slow with Random writes Synology NAS. Cache in the following manners for letting US know how we can better... Are harder to get now here in canada has been Working in Storage! The major manufacturers have been selling SMR without clearly branding them as such I built my NAS I 8. The newere EFAX drives have better Hardware specifications than the older EFRX/EFZX series in new... ( Shingled Magnetic Recording ) drives, then they would be slow with Random writes SMR clearly. Without clearly branding them as such wd60efrx vs wd60efax my NAS I decided 8 tb was the sweet.. In canada loves Technology and writing about it not just marketing maybe the 1-8 disk for. Loves Technology and writing about it US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, York! © Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor, new York, NY 10036 shipping! With western Digital for sure access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips here!